Florian Schmidt
ec51419f64
ci / build-test (push) Successful in 2m23s
The brief (§12) asks for a report: which of its findings A01-A14 were
fixed and how, how physical and virtual results now agree, which cost and
aggregation decisions were applied to existing data, what was tested, and
what is still missing. docs/ANALYSIS_REPORT.md is that, with a file path
and a pinning test for every row, the acceptance scenarios with their
evidence, the measured performance, and the limitations -- including the
three the note already records (raw retention not enforced, monthly
imports never interpolated, a full recompute per ingested reading) and the
three hotspots the measurement found.
The screenshots it references show the Overview, a physical and a virtual
meter, and an energy type's history at desktop and phone widths, plus two
"before" shots at c0f52db for comparison: the old Overview, and the old
virtual meter page, which offered a flow link instead of any analysis.
204 KiB
390x3076px
204 KiB
390x3076px
